Advent, Getting into the Spirit of Christmas and the Arrival of the Now but Not Yet Kingdom

By -

 


What exactly is this thing that we call “the Spirit of Christmas”? We’ve all heard of it, and most people certainly try to get into the Spirit of Christmas (or the Christmas Spirit) as we head into Christmas. We know that Scrooge knew how to keep Christmas all the year round, which is presumably the Spirit of Christmas, but what exactly is it that he kept?

G.K Chesterton tried to define the Spirit of Christmas in his book, The Thing: Why I am a Catholic, but found it was easier to describe how people falsely try to create the Spirit of Christmas by keeping the externals while ignoring the essentials.

I have rather rashly undertaken to write of the Spirit of Christmas; and it presents a preliminary difficulty about which I must be candid. People are very curious nowadays in their way of talking about “the spirit” of a thing. There is, for example, a particular sort of prig who is always lecturing us about the spirit of true Christianity, apart from all names and forms. As far as I can make out, he means the very opposite of what he says. He means that we are to go on using the names “Christian” and “Christianity,” and so on, for something in which it is quite specially the spirit that is not Christian; something that is a sort of combination of the baseless optimism or an American atheist with the pacifism of a mild Hindu. In the same way, we read a great deal about the Spirit of Christmas in modern journalism or commercialism; but it is really a reversal of the same kind. So far from preserving the essentials without the externals, it is rather preserving the externals where there cannot be the essentials. It means taking two mere material substances, like holly and mistletoe, and spreading them all over huge and homeless cosmopolitan hotels or round the Doric columns of impersonal clubs full of jaded and cynical old gentlemen; or in any other places where the actual spirit of Christmas is least likely to be. ~ G.K. Chesterton, The Thing: Why I am a Catholic

His difficulty is understandable. Ask someone you know what she does to get into the Christmas Spirit, there is almost no hesitation to share a list of familiar Christmas activities. For many, getting into the Christmas Spirit involves decorating the house, hanging the stockings by the fire and putting up the tree. For others it is those delicious sugary Christmas cookies. For still others, getting into the Christmas Spirit may involve reading Clement Clark Moore’s “A Visit from St. Nicholas” to their kids; while for many others it is reading the account of Jesus’ birth from the Gospel of Luke (or, at least, listening again to Linus reading the word from Luke 2 in “A Charlie Brown Christmas.” The list is practically endless, and for many getting into the Christmas Spirit involves caroling or shopping or crafting or candles or parties or helping the poor or a combination of several of these things.

It is also understandable that the list will differ depending on whether the person answering is a Christian. After all, it is still the case that most people in America would include going to church on Christmas Eve as part of the rituals of the season – even those that aren’t particularly religious often go to church because they go to be with grandma or their parents. But few non-Christians include devotional time with God – something that several of my Christian friends would include as an essential on their lists of getting into the Christmas Spirit.

But regardless of whether they are Christian or not, when you ask your friends of family to define what the Spirit of Christmas is, most side-step. What is this thing that we are trying to “get in”? Some respond “a feeling of peace on Earth, goodwill to men,” quoting from the aforementioned Gospel of Luke. Some express it as a time to slow down and re-experience the “magic” of Christmas. But regardless of how many people you ask, you will find that there is no clear answer – and the answers are even more varied for those who are not Christians. Seriously, try it. I did.

It seems that one commonality among many – as reflected in our Christmas celebration – includes reminiscing about Christmases past in an effort to recapture the excitement and wonder of Christmas that many experienced as children. Few think back to childhood without recalling the magic that came from opening Christmas presents, caroling at the neighbors’ houses or waiting for the visit from Santa Claus. It was a time of innocence, and many of us remember it with great fondness.

Even many of our favorite secular Christmas songs encourage looking back or remembering feelings associated with Christmases past. Consider songs like White Christmas (“I’m dreaming of a White Christmas/just like the ones I used to know”), The Christmas Song (“Chestnuts roasting on an open fire/jack frost nipping at your nose/yuletide carols being sung by a choir”), and Silver Bells (“Christmas makes you feel emotional/it may bring parties or thoughts devotional”). Much of our Christmas iconography reaches back to what we romantically recall as more innocent times as represented by Dickens’ Christmas villages or model train tracks around the tree.

In other words, much of our Christmas celebration is based in nostalgia and is aimed at invoking a mood. And in many ways, our efforts to get into the Christmas Spirit is an effort to capture a feeling of nostalgia for simpler, more magical times – a connection with Christmases past.

But it is my belief that focusing back to Christmases past is the opposite of what we ought to be doing to try to get into the Christmas Spirit. I say that because the time to get into the Christmas Spirit in the church is the season that is called Advent, and it is not the time to dwell on the past.

For those unfamiliar with the liturgical year, Advent is actually the first season in the Christian calendar. It is the four weeks heading into Christmas and is a time of preparation. In many churches, it is celebrated by lighting candles representing (depending on the tradition) hope, faith, joy, peace, love, purity and the Christ.



However, one thing that most people (including Christians) miss is that Advent is decidedly not a time for looking back. It is a time of looking forward. The word “Advent” itself comes from the Latin word “adventus” which means “coming.”. It is a time to look forward to the coming of Christ – not backwards with nostalgia.

But, some might say, Christians believe Jesus has already come – that is an event in the past. Well, yes and no. You see, Advent is a time to prepare our hearts for the coming of the Christ – but not just the baby “wrapped in swaddling clothes, lying in a manger” (Luke 2:12) that is the heart of the celebration on December 25. It is also about getting our hearts ready for Christ to come again in His full Glory. As stated on Christianity.com:

Advent symbolizes the present situation of the church in these “last days” (Acts 2:17, Hebrews 1:2), as God’s people wait for the return of Christ in glory to consummate his eternal kingdom. The church is in a similar situation to Israel at the end of the Old Testament: in exile, waiting and hoping in prayerful expectation for the coming of the Messiah. Israel looked back to God’s past gracious actions on their behalf in leading them out of Egypt in the Exodus, and on this basis, they called for God once again to act for them. In the same way, the church, during Advent, looks back upon Christ’s coming in celebration while at the same time looking forward in eager anticipation to the coming of Christ’s kingdom when he returns for his people.

The article quoted above is pretty good, but misses the point when it says the church "looks back upon Christ's coming." Actually, Advent looks forward to the birth of Christ even though it already happened more than 2,000 years ago. The Advent season is about getting our hearts ready to welcome anew the Baby in the manger, but not in some sentimental sense of looking back at a quaint manger scene which is what dominates much of our Christian Christmas celebration. Advent is about looking forward once again to the greatest gift of love that God bestowed upon us – the gift of salvation that is present and living. Christmas is a time of joyous celebration for that reason. But Advent is also about looking forward to the Second Coming of that same Child, but this time in His full power and might!

Advent (and Christmas, for that matter) is a time to celebrate the Kingdom of God – the kingdom that is both now, but not yet. The kingdom of God broke into this world when Jesus was born, lived, was crucified, died and resurrected for our salvation. When Jesus said on the cross, “It is finished” (John 19:30), it was. Evil and death were both defeated and Jesus is now reigning at the right hand of the Father. But at the same time, we know it is not finished yet in this world because we continue to see evil in our world and we all struggle with death. Jesus’ victory and his Kingdom are both now, but not yet.

In the same way, Advent is the now, but not yet season. Jesus has come and we celebrate his first coming by preparing our hearts for that coming as if it were brand new again. But it isn’t the end of what we prepare for during Advent. We know that He is coming back. This Second Coming – the not yet part of His Coming – is what we ought to also be in preparation for during this season.

And that, my friends, is how we get into a true Christmas Spirit. But what is this Spirit of Christmas that we are trying to enter? To answer that, we need to ask the same question Charlie Brown asked in A Charlie Brown Christmas – “Isn’t there anyone who can tell me the true meaning of Christmas?” And Linus does: The true meaning of Christmas is the birth of the Savior as a baby in Bethlehem. It is the start of the giving part of John 3:16, i.e., “For God so loved the world, that He gave His only Son, so that everyone who believes in Him will not perish, but have eternal life.” It is the beginning of the Now but Not Yet Kingdom of God, a Kingdom that is based on God’s perfect, unrelenting love towards us.

To truly get into the Christmas Spirit requires that we follow suit. It is a time of introducing and sharing that Kingdom of God through loving any who will receive it. It is a time of giving gifts. It is a time of baking cookies (nothing says love more than a hot chocolate chip cookie). It is about sharing the gift of music, the gift of time, the gift of service.

But doing these things absent from the underlying meaning of Christmas – the celebration of the birth of God’s gift of salvation, is no more than a means of getting into the mood of Christmas. That is not the same as the Spirit. The mood fades when the cookies burn or it doesn’t snow on Christmas Day or when the presents have all been opened. The Christmas Spirit continues despite what can go wrong because it is rooted in the eternal – the eternal love of God.

The true Christmas Spirit is reflecting the love that God has first given us to those around us even when the world does not return that love. And the best way to get into this Spirit of Christmas is to make the Christmas season real by preparing our hearts for the “Now but Not Yet Kingdom.” We look forward to His Second Coming by preparing to celebrate the First Coming.

So, go ahead and watch a Christmas movie. Go ahead and decorate, bake yummy Christmas cookies, hang your stockings and decorate the tree. All of these things are good in the sense that the serve as reminders of what the season is about. But please don’t take a feeling of warm nostalgia for Christmases past as the true Spirit of Christmas. That is keeping the externals while sacrificing the essentials.

Rather, get yourself into the true Spirit of Christmas by knowing that God is real, and it is the coming of His Kingdom that we celebrate. Focus on seeing Christmas as the time to prepare your heart and your thoughts for His Coming – both the now, but not yet. Then share God’s love with those around you – especially those who are not easy to love. God knows that they aren’t lovable but he loves them, too. (By the way, the same goes for you, too – God loves you even though you aren’t particularly the most loveable person, either.) If you remember that God’s plan of salvation is the real essential of Christmas, you, like Scrooge, will find it easy to “keep Christmas well” the whole year around.

 

 

Comments

Joseph Hinman (Metacrock) said…
good post Bill. the point of Christmas, sharing God/s love by celebrating the incarnation.
12/22/2020 02:41:00 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How Many Children in Bethlehem Did Herod Kill?

By -
A couple of months ago, I wrote a post about the Gospel of Matthew’s account of the slaughter of the innocents. Therein, I argued that some of the skepticism about the account was unjustified. One argument I made was that the number of children killed in Bethlehem would likely have been no more than 20. Though obviously an act of great evil, the killing of 20 children would be much less likely to be noticed by historians of the time than the slaughter of thousands as later traditions speculated. In response to the post, Peter Kirby asked a few questions. He has patiently waited my response, continuously delayed by work, family, and the completion of my Acts article . Two of the questions had to do with how the amount of 20 was determined. Others with the omission of the account by Luke and the reliability of the tradition recounted by Macrobius. Peter also mentioned that there were other reasons to doubt the story's historicity beyond just the silence of other sources. I ...
Read more

The Bogus Gandhi Quote

By J. P Holding -
Image
I first made this post in 2012, and since then I've made a sort of mini-career out of tracking down bogus quotes like this one (including a video version below). It's a sort of fun microcosm of the way information is mishandled in the Information Age. ** I like your Christ. I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ. – Mahatma Gandhi A Christian can probably expect to get this quote thrown at them at least once in their lifetime, and waved in their face many more. I had it put to me recently, but my experience with this sort of thing immediately led me to wonder -- is it real? The evidence at this point seems to be no. The first signal of a problem was that anywhere I found it, no source was given. That's often a sign that something is being passed around uncritically. Whether online sources or books, no one seemed to have a source for this quote. A second warning was that the quote has been given more than one context. As ...
Read more

Where did Jesus say "It is better to give than receive?"

By -
A visitor to the CADRE site recently sent a question about Paul's statement in Acts 20:35 which records Paul as saying, "And remember the words of the Lord Jesus, that He said, 'It is better to give than to receive'." The reader wanted to know where Jesus said this. This was my answer: You are correct in noting that this saying of Jesus quoted by Paul is not found anywhere in the four Gospels. My own study Bible says "This is a rare instance of a saying of Jesus not found in the canonical Gospels." Does the fact that it isn't stated in the Gospels mean that it isn't reliably from the lips of Jesus? I don't think so. The Apolstle John said at the end of his Gospel (John 21:25): "Jesus did many other things as well.If every one of them were written down, I suppose that even the whole world would not have room for the books that would be written." Obviously, this is exaggeration for the sake of making a point, but it means that Jesus ...
Read more

Discussing Embryonic Stem Cell Research

By -
Stand to Reason has published a list of "talking points" that can be used as a quick reference sheet for answering questions about embryonic stem cell research and why people ought to oppose this procedure. The piece, entitled "Are you against stem cell research and cloning?" give good, concise answers to some of the questions that arise concerning why Christians would oppose this procedure when it supposedly holds such great promise. For example, consider the following from the "talking points": Where do we get human embryonic stem cells? We can only derive human embryonic stem cells by killing a human embryo. Removing its stem cells leaves it with no cells from which to build the organs of its body. What is the embryo? An embryo is a living, whole, human organism (a human being) in the embryonic stage. All the embryo needs to live is a proper environment and adequate nutrition, the very same thing all infants, toddlers, adolescents, and adults need. ...
Read more

Tillich, part 2: What does it mean to say "God is Being Itself?"

By -
 In this essay, which is a chapter from the new book I'm now working on, I'm moving toward defining what I think Tillich means exactly by being itself. It's a long journey but an important one. What does Tillich actually mean by “being itself?” Does he mean the same things as other theologians who use the phrase? It’s a mysterious sounding phrase and Tillich never actually comes out and says what he means by it. As I will show there is a reason for this, and I will show what I think that reason in is. In the mean time the task of this chapter is to deduce exactly what Tillich actually means by this phrase. There are three basic possibilities: Three alternatives as to meaning (1) The basic fact that things exist is all that the concept of “God” amounts to. (2) There is a special quality to being, an impersonal aspect” ground of being” or “being itself” and that quality constitutes ‘the divine.’ This possibility excludes God as “king of the universe.” (3) God is b...
Read more

Revamping and New Articles at the CADRE Site

By -
We have changed the Christian History page at the CADRE site from the old design to the new one. The focus of the revamped page has expanded, with many new articles: This page provides links to websites and articles relating to Christian history, including theological development, notable figures, contributions of Christianity to society and culture, and the archaeological evidence for the facts of the Bible. We have also added four new articles by Darin Wood, PhD: John Chrysostum: His Life, Legacy, and Influence Dr. Wood provides an informative sketch of Chrysostum's life, as well as an exploration into his writings and impact on church evangelism. The Righteousness of God in the Pauline Corpus Dr. Wood examines the crucial role that righteousness plays in understanding Paul's perspectives on justification, propitiation, expiation, and covenant. The Structure of the Apocalypse Dr. Wood provides an in-depth analysis of the structure (or structures) behind the Book o...
Read more

The Folded Napkin Legend

By J. P Holding -
I wrote about t his "urban legend" a few years ago, but it's typical of the silly urban legends we hear about now and then, such as the idea that the head of Proctor and Gamble went on Oprah to pledge his allegiance to Satanism. Christians are no less gullible for this sort of nonsense than anyone else, and frankly, some seem more gullible to believe anything that they consider "edifying". It's no wonder we're mesmerized by self-comfort tunes like "I Can Only Imagine" that contain about as much useful theology as a thimble. ** The Gospel of John (20:7) tells us that the napkin, which was placed over the face of Jesus, was not just thrown aside like the grave clothes. The Bible takes an entire verse to tell us that the napkin was neatly folded, and was placed at the head of that stony coffin.... In order to understand the significance of the folded napkin, you have to understand a little bit about Hebrew tradition of that day. The fol...
Read more

A Botched Abortion Shows the Lies of Pro-Choice Proponents

By -
One of the classes I teach at the university is a course on Ethics, and I am using a book by Ralph Dolgoff, Donna Harrington and Frank M. Lowenberg entitled " Ethical Decisions for Social Work Practice " as the text. Overall, I think that it is a good Ethics textbook largely because it provides a balanced viewpoint on the need for values in social work. For example, the book makes the argument (without committing to it) that those engaged in social work cannot avoid making value judgments in ethical decisions because trying to do what is right necessarily involves making an value choice. Also, I book notes that some (including me) think it is ethically wrong for a social worker to cover-up her own values when counseling another person because it creates a false (and ultimately unproductive) relationship with the person being counseled. Still, one of the exemplars in the book gave me pause – not because I thought it raised a deep ethical quandary, but because I wondered how ...
Read more

Do you say this of your own accord? (John 18:34, ESV)

By -
Image
One of the most well-known events in Scriptures is Jesus' exchange with Pontius Pilate at his trial as described in John 18. In verse 38 of that chapter, Pilate asks the question that may be the most ironic in the history of the world, "What is truth?" A less known but equally intriguing saying of Jesus from an apologetics viewpoint can be found in Jesus' response to an earlier question in the same trial. It is a question that is not often quoted, but on those rare occasions when it is quoted, Jesus' response is often overlooked as not particularly important or relevant to today's world. However, it is my experience (as well as the experience of many people who have truly spent time studying the Scriptures) that little, if any, of what Jesus said in the Bible lacks significance across time. To best understand the response, it's important to see the response in context. The situation is this: Jesus has been arrested following His betrayal by Judas I...
Read more

A Non-Biblical Historian Accepts the Key "Minimum Facts" Supporting Jesus' Resurrection

By -
In their book, The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus , Gary R. Habermas and Michael R. Licona argue for the historical reality of Jesus' bodily resurrection using the "minimum facts" approach. Rather than get bogged down in inerrancy and other debates, they focus on the key facts demonstrating Jesus' resurrection. For them, the key facts are: *Jesus' death by crucifixion. *Disciples' Beliefs that Jesus Appeared. *Conversion of Paul. *Conversion of James. *Empty Tomb. William L. Craig, another significant apologist for the historical bodily resurrection of Jesus likewise focuses, in his accessible The Son Rises , on the empty tomb and Jesus' resurrection appearance. Craig gives special emphasis to Jesus' honorable burial by Joseph of Arimathea and Jesus' appearances to James and Paul and their subsequent commitment to the Christian cause. Craig, Licona, and Habermas argue that these basic facts are generally supported by most of the relevant sc...
Read more