If he does not mind, I would like to build on BK's excellent post from yesterday on Jesus' self identification as God. I agree entirely with him that Jesus' self identification as God is central the Christian assertion, but there is more: namely, the witnesses to Jesus' life here on earth. If Jesus did not say He was God, then we are left with an even greater puzzle. After all, what would motivate people to ascribe divinity to a man who m they knew had been crucified (the worst form of death in that society at that time)?
There is a wonderful exchange in the book/movie "The Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe" where Susan and Peter are talking with the professor. They relate Lucy's "impossible" story of another world found through a wardrobe. The professor listens intently, thinks about it for a long time, and then the conversation went thus:
Professor: "How do you know that your sister's story is not true?"
Susan: "Oh but... But Edmund said that they had only been pretending."
Professor: "Does your experience lead you to regard your brother or your sister as the more reliable? I mean, which is the more truthful?"
Peter: "That's the funny thing about it, sir. Up until now I'd have said Lucy every time."
Professor: "And what do you think my dear?"
Susan: "Well, in general I'd say the same as Peter, but this couldn't be true-all this about the wood and the Faun."
Professor: "That is more than I know, and a charge of lying is a very serious thing; a very serious thing indeed."
Susan: "We were afraid it mightn't even be lying. We thought there might be something wrong with Lucy."
Professor: "Madness you mean? Oh you can make up your minds easy about that. One has only to look at her and talk to her to see that she is not mad."
"Logic... There are only three possibilities. Either your sister is lying, or she is mad, or she is telling the truth..."
And that is the crux of the matter. Do we believe the witnesses or not? Those witnesses tell us plainly not only about Jesus' miracles, teachings, death, and resurrection, they also tell us that He is God incarnate, the Word made flesh, the man who is in very nature God, the Lord of all whom all must, and will, worship forever. Behold, we hear John the Baptist say, the Lamb of God. Even if one doubts that the Baptist said this, someone did, and he did so within the lifetime of the first generation of believers. What are we to make of it? They are either lying, mad, or telling the truth. If they were lying, then they made up a story no one before them had ever made up about anyone whom they had actually known. If they were mad, then we must understand why their madness was so infectious and convincing to so many people who seem quite sane and rational. Or, alternatively, we must consider that they were telling the truth, regardless of how extraordinary and bizarre that story might seem.
This is the case for virtually everything we believe in life. It is a rare thing that we can test something that has been told to us no matter our resources, available time, and intelligence. At the end of the day we either believe those who talk to us, or we do not. And if we are to believe them, we must consider their character above all else, as it is there that we will know if a person is, at heart, an honest witness, or a false one.
Nomad
Welcome
Welcome to the Christian CADRE blog for the Christian CADRE website. The members of the CADRE maintain this blog for commenting on various items of interest to apologetics. We welcome input. E-mail us at christiancadre@yahoo.com.
Contributors
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(331)
-
▼
January
(30)
- Luigi Cascioli's frivolous claims in the Italian J...
- On judging witnesses
- The Importance of Jesus' Self-Identification as Go...
- Heaven -- U2's where the streets have no name
- New Additions to the Cadre Site
- Manchester Passion -- Another modern Gospel retell...
- The Assumption of Moses
- Some problems with defining God
- Jesus the Revolutionary -- the Son of Man film
- Is Richard Carrier Wrong about The Assumption of M...
- Is Richard Carrier Wrong About What the Herodians ...
- Jesus, the tax law and the regulations
- New Book on Christianity's Role in Social Progress...
- A Critical Review of Dennis R. MacDonald's Theory ...
- What Does the New Supreme Court Decision on Aborti...
- The Fear of Theological Controversy
- A sin apologists need to beware
- Euthephro Dilemma and Biological Ethics
- Hail to the King
- Biblical literalism, the Great Gatsby and multiple...
- Two Jesus Myth Proponents Taken to Task by New Tes...
- Abortion by the numbers
- Another Critical Review of The God Who Wasn't Ther...
- Rolling away the stoner
- Holy Matrimony Controversy
- Is Richard Carrier Wrong about what the Sadducees ...
- God as the product of evolution and the need for a...
- An Italian court is going to decide if Jesus exist...
- The War on Hanukkah
- New Year, study harder!
-
▼
January
(30)
CADRE Blogs of Interest
-
-
-
-
Songs from Hometown USA7 hours ago
-
Science Proves Nothing (Part 5)8 hours ago
-
Book Review11 hours ago
-
Praying With Children11 hours ago
-
The Courage to be vs the Cowardly Mind12 hours ago
-
-
-
Groothuis on Yoga20 hours ago
-
The HEMS Homeschool Convention1 day ago
-
-
Apologist Interview: Richard Howe2 days ago
-
-
-
Metaphysical Pathos2 weeks ago
-
May Biblical Studies Carnivals2 weeks ago
-
-
-
-
Amputees and God2 months ago
-
Shroud of Turin Back in the News2 months ago
-
-
How Can God Still Love Me?5 months ago
Comments Policy
This blog is open to comments by anyone interested provided: (1) the comments are civil, (2) they are on point, and (3) they do not represent efforts by the comment authors to steer readers to long posts on other websites. The members of the CADRE reserve the right to delete any posts that do not adhere to these policies without any further explanation.
Popular Posts
-
Study: The Miracles: A Doctor says "Yes" by Richard H. Casdorph.(Logos International, 1976) Richard H. Casdroph collected medic...
-
A visitor to the CADRE site recently sent a question about Paul's statement in Acts 20:35 which records Paul as saying, "And rememb...
-
Today is Good Friday, the day that we commemorate Jesus' death. Why, given the nature of that remembrance, is it called "Good Frida...
-
What are your favorites from any tradition, including classical, country, praise & worship, contemporary Christian, Christian rock, gosp...
-
One of my co-bloggers, J.L. Hinman, author of the very fine Metacrock's Blog recently showed me some data which some atheists are using...
-
The manger in which Jesus was laid has colored our imagery of Christmas. A manger, "[i]s a feeding-trough, crib, or open box in a stabl...
-
A couple of months ago, I wrote a post about the Gospel of Matthew’s account of the slaughter of the innocents. Therein, I argued that som...
-
pie charts from Pew study In the late 90s atheists began making the argument that less than a majority of scientists believe in God. In a...
-
A friend mentioned to me that he ran into an argument I had not heard for a while. Apparently, in A World Full of Gods , Keith Hopkins stat...
-
I've been posting a lot recently on different models of the atonement (and there's more to come!) but recently I came across a poten...
Posted by
Nomad
January 30, 2006
1 comments:
- BK said...
-
You are sooooo right on. I was going to follow up my last post with something similar, but you have said it better and more plainly that I. I find the witness testimony compelling -- but not just the witnesses of the four Gospels. More on that later . . . .
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Use of Content
The contents of this blog may be reproduced or forwarded via e-mail without change and in its entirety for non-commercial purposes without prior permission from the Christian CADRE provided that the copyright information is included. We would appreciate notification of the use of our content. Please e-mail us at christiancadre@yahoo.com.
