Another Critical Review of The God Who Wasn't There

In an earlier post, BK did us all a favor by providing links to reviews of the latest skeptic attempt to give some legitimacy to the hopelessly illegitmate theory that Jesus never really existed. My friend GakuseiDon, author of Earl Doherty, the Jesus Myth, and Second Century Christian Writings, has written his own review. His conclusions:

I find that he presents inaccurate information as fact, and provide evidence to that effect. I conclude that, whatever the validity of the subject, Flemming's documentary should be viewed for entertainment purposes rather than education. I strongly urge anyone interested in this topic to follow up on some of these points for themselves, rather than take my word or Flemming's word for it.

Read the entire review for some sober analysis and check back as GD adds further analysis.


Popular posts from this blog

Revamping and New Articles at the CADRE Site

Where did Jesus say "It is better to give than receive?"

Discussing Embryonic Stem Cell Research

On the Significance of Simon of Cyrene, Father of Alexander and Rufus

The Genre of the Gospel of John (Part 1)

Martin Luther King, Jr., Jesus, Jonah and U2’s Pride in the Name of Love

The Meaning of the Manger

Luke, the Census, and Quirinius: A Matter of Translation

Scientifically Documented Miracles

Morriston refutes Craig over deriving Personal God from Kalam