Was The Inaugural Prayer a Dig at Michael Newdow?

As regular readers of this blog have surmised, I am in favor of maintaining the great tradition in this country of giving thanks to God at public functions for the benefits he has bestowed upon us. I think it is a very minor infringement upon the liberties of those who don't want to hear it in recognition of the fact that the vast majority of the country is religious.

The Reverend Michael Newdow (and I use the term "reverend" with a smirk on my face for reasons I detail here) has been the main engine for attacks on the public recognition of God. He has twice filed lawsuits seeking to ban "under God" from the pledge of allegiance, and has recently lost his second bid in court to ban the public prayer at Bush's inauguration ceremonies (he apparently tried to ban the prayer at the 2000 swearing in ceremony).

As I listened to the prayer, I wondered whether the Rev. Luis Leon, the Episcopal minister who gave the prayer, intended to take a subtle swipe at Newdow. During the early part of the prayer, he intoned that we were "one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all." Yes, he combined the prayer with the tail end of the pledge of allegiance. Newdow must have had steam coming out of his ears (assuming he was listening and not sitting in the corner pouting).

Okay, quoting the pledge once could have been an oversight, but then, towards the end of the prayer, the minister said it again: we are "one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all." Twice in the same prayer, he quoted from the Pledge of Allegiance--the part that Newdow is suing to remove!! (I have to admit that I let out a guffaw when I heard it.)

I have mixed feelings about this. I think that a prayer to God should not be used to slap someone in the face. If Rev. Leon intentionally included the refence to chide Newdow, then I think that it was inappropriate and I would urge him not to use prayer as a tool against people with whom he may disagree in the future.

However, if it wasn't an intentional slap at Newdow, and instead Rev. Leon wrote what he felt to be right under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit without consciously realizing what he was doing, then it appears that God was taking a dig at Newdow through the "unintended" consequence of the prayer. Who says God doesn't have a sense of humor?


biblemike said…
I pray it was God's humor and not our brother's animosity that led to the repeating phrases in his prayer. I prefer to believe, barring evidence to the contrary, that our Christian brother spoke the words laid on his heart by God's Holy Spirit. Such an auspicious occasion is not the time to make personal atttacks on those with whom you have disagreements. Unfortunately, there will be many who will see it as a slap at Neudow and he will certainly claim it was so. Hopefully, the numbers will be insufficient to detract from the weight of the prayer for our leader and our nation.

Popular posts from this blog

Where did Jesus say "It is better to give than receive?"

Revamping and New Articles at the CADRE Site

Discussing Embryonic Stem Cell Research

Martin Luther King, Jr., Jesus, Jonah and U2’s Pride in the Name of Love

On the Significance of Simon of Cyrene, Father of Alexander and Rufus

The Genre of the Gospel of John (Part 1)

The Meaning of the Manger

Scientifically Documented Miracles

A Simple Illustration of the Trinity

Luke, the Census, and Quirinius: A Matter of Translation