Is God Omniscient or Omniaware?
Should we change our language?

Daniel of the Reformed Apologetical and Theological Society has written an interesting post concerning our description of God as "omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent." He focuses on the third of these three qualities, attempting to clarify what we mean by that term. He notes:

[T]he eternality of God negates a temporal understanding of omnipresence; and the immateriality of God negates a spatial understanding of it. Analysis has left us with a blank term, an empty signifier. The idea of omnipresence simply does not make sense when applied to God, the only being for whom it is supposed to be applicable.

One of the first arguments I had with an atheist concerned his disagreement with the idea that God could be omnipresent and his challenge to me to try to make sense of the Biblical teaching. As a result, I think that this is a topic of concern to apologists, and while I don't see any reason to discontineu using the term "omnipresent", I agree that apologists as a whole should do more thinking about the meaning of these terms.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Martin Luther King, Jr., Jesus, Jonah and U2’s Pride in the Name of Love

How Many Children in Bethlehem Did Herod Kill?

How Should I Be A Sceptic -- belief and reason

Kierkegaard's Knights of Faith and the Account of Abraham

Bayes Theorem And Probability of God: No Dice!

The Meaning of the Manger

If Christianity were true, would you become a Christian?

The Origin of Life and the Fallacy of Composition

Where did Jesus say "It is better to give than receive?"