Just Another E-mail Received by the CADRE

By -
Warning: Profanity Alert.

____________________________________

From: [Random Skeptic]

Subject: Debates!

I have studied arguments for and against for a long time now, And have come to one conclusion.Debates like these go one for ever for one reason,NOBODY really has the whole truth about anything, it's all speculation.You guy's are pretty much full of your selves/sh**!
____________________________________

From: [Chris (Layman)]

Subject: Re: Debates!

John,

Thank you for your note.

I daresay that your last sentence suggests that the sophistication of your "long time" of study was not very high.

As for having the "whole truth about anything," I do not even presume to have the "whole truth" about what I had for breakfast this morning. So I think that criticism is misplaced as applied to me and likely my fellow bloggers.

All the best,

Chris (Layman)
_____________________________________

From: [Random Skeptic]

Re: Debates!

Thanks for reproving you're arrogance, typical response from the religious brain dead.The only time I wasted on your web site was when I saw your write up about Acharya S.You said she was WRONG! If you agree nobody has complete truth, then you can't really say ANYBODY is wrong....By the way,do waste your time writing back as I will only delete your name when I see it. If I have learned only one thing from you hollier than thou's it's this,IF YOU'RE GOING TO MATCH WITTS WITH THE WITTLESS BE PREPARED TO LOOSE!

Comments

Leslie said…
lol ... that's pretty awesome. I'd say something is loose, alright.
1/25/2009 06:07:00 AM
Mike aka MonolithTMA said…
I thought you were pretty loose already. :-P


All the brilliant, well read atheists out there and this one decides to write you? Well, at least it provided some humor.

It seems to be a trend on any kind of web site, if you are going to write fan mail, then you must be at least partially illiterate. ;-)
1/25/2009 06:27:00 AM
Joseph Hinman (Metacrock) said…
lol good one Mike.

you guys are so charitable. My answer:

thumbs in ears, waving fingers like mouse antlers, doing raspberry.


I guess I'm ready to write some fan mail!
1/25/2009 07:06:00 AM
Anonymous said…
Layman,

I wonder if this person thinks that people who do think they have the whole truth are wrong? Or is that just speculation? Hmmmm....

I do think its nice you even take the time to answer these though.
1/25/2009 06:36:00 PM
Layman said…
A Hermit,

What makes you think you can post unedited profanity on this site is beyond me, even if you say you are quoting it from somewhere else.
1/26/2009 12:44:00 PM
Anonymous said…
"What makes you think you can post unedited profanity on this site is beyond me, even if you say you are quoting it from somewhere else."

Funny, no one's ever objected before when I've quoted one of Hinman's comments...;-) I'll blank out the bad words when doing so in the future.

But if you have a problem with the profanity perhaps just editing the offending word, instead of deleting my whole comment, would be enough. My point still stands; I can find plenty of example of Christians (including members of this blog) saying stupid things in emails I've received; but I don't think that would say anything about Christians in general.

So what was the point of this little post?
1/26/2009 01:02:00 PM
Layman said…
A Hermit,

Yes, blanking out or editing them is acceptable if reasonable.

I posted this email because it struck me as particularly funny. I didn't expect the reaction I got to my response.

Its also good to remind people that though skeptics and atheists often claim the mantle of reason and dispassionate analysis, that is not necessarily the case.
1/26/2009 01:45:00 PM
Mike aka MonolithTMA said…
I wear the mantle of reason and dispassionate analysis with pride. ;-)
1/26/2009 01:47:00 PM
Anonymous said…
Layman said...

"I posted this email because it struck me as particularly funny."

And I posted my comment because I thought it was funny to compare that incoherent profanity laden comment I'd just received from a member of this blog to your e-mail example...

"Its also good to remind people that though skeptics and atheists often claim the mantle of reason and dispassionate analysis, that is not necessarily the case."

Fair enough, but then we should allow equal time for my observation that Christian claims of greater civility, patience and reason aren't always necessarily the case either...

All of which might be fun for both of us,; I'm just not sure it serves any constructive purpose...

------------------------

Mike aka MonolithTMA said

"I wear the mantle of reason and dispassionate analysis with pride. ;-)"

Goes nicely with a Cap of Critical Thinking...;-)
1/26/2009 02:21:00 PM
Layman said…
A-Hermit,

And I posted my comment because I thought it was funny to compare that incoherent profanity laden comment I'd just received from a member of this blog to your e-mail example...

I did not ask you why you posted your comment. I deleted it because of the unedited profanity.

Fair enough, but then we should allow equal time for my observation that Christian claims of greater civility, patience and reason aren't always necessarily the case either...

Why should you have "equal time" on someone else's blog that seeks to promote a different view than yours?

All of which might be fun for both of us,; I'm just not sure it serves any constructive purpose...

Its not up to you to be sure. Its not your site.
1/26/2009 02:27:00 PM
Anonymous said…
"Why should you have "equal time" on someone else's blog that seeks to promote a different view than yours?"

Why allow comments if you're afraid of hearing another point of view?

I just thought it was amusing to see a post mocking an incoherent e-mail followed by a comment from a member of this blog who has occasionally sent me similar e-mails, and who had just posted an incoherent, profanity laden reply to me on another blog. The coincidence struck me as funny.

Atheists can have a sense of humour, too...;-)
1/26/2009 02:42:00 PM
Layman said…
Why allow comments if you're afraid of hearing another point of view?

Perhaps this can act as another example of an atheist demonstrating poor reasoning. Who suggested anyone on this blog was afraid of hearing another point of view? Have you really seen my actions on this blog and other forums and come to the conclusion I'm afraid of hearing other view points? Far from it. I seek them out.
1/26/2009 03:56:00 PM
Anonymous said…
"Who suggested anyone on this blog was afraid of hearing another point of view? Have you really seen my actions on this blog and other forums and come to the conclusion I'm afraid of hearing other view points?"

Well, you deleted my first comment, and then said this:

"Why should you have "equal time" on someone else's blog that seeks to promote a different view than yours?"
So perhaps I got wrong the impression, but I didn't have much else to go on...;-)
1/26/2009 04:00:00 PM
Layman said…
Nothing in that comment suggested fear of hearing other ideas. If that is all you had to go on, you made the wrong leap of faith.
1/26/2009 04:02:00 PM
Carl said…
Dear "Random Skeptic",

I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent.

Sincerely,
Specific Christian

[[The above comment has been close-captioned for the humor-impaired.]]
1/27/2009 05:53:00 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How Many Children in Bethlehem Did Herod Kill?

By -
A couple of months ago, I wrote a post about the Gospel of Matthew’s account of the slaughter of the innocents. Therein, I argued that some of the skepticism about the account was unjustified. One argument I made was that the number of children killed in Bethlehem would likely have been no more than 20. Though obviously an act of great evil, the killing of 20 children would be much less likely to be noticed by historians of the time than the slaughter of thousands as later traditions speculated. In response to the post, Peter Kirby asked a few questions. He has patiently waited my response, continuously delayed by work, family, and the completion of my Acts article . Two of the questions had to do with how the amount of 20 was determined. Others with the omission of the account by Luke and the reliability of the tradition recounted by Macrobius. Peter also mentioned that there were other reasons to doubt the story's historicity beyond just the silence of other sources. I ...
Read more

The Bogus Gandhi Quote

By J. P Holding -
Image
I first made this post in 2012, and since then I've made a sort of mini-career out of tracking down bogus quotes like this one (including a video version below). It's a sort of fun microcosm of the way information is mishandled in the Information Age. ** I like your Christ. I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ. – Mahatma Gandhi A Christian can probably expect to get this quote thrown at them at least once in their lifetime, and waved in their face many more. I had it put to me recently, but my experience with this sort of thing immediately led me to wonder -- is it real? The evidence at this point seems to be no. The first signal of a problem was that anywhere I found it, no source was given. That's often a sign that something is being passed around uncritically. Whether online sources or books, no one seemed to have a source for this quote. A second warning was that the quote has been given more than one context. As ...
Read more

Where did Jesus say "It is better to give than receive?"

By -
A visitor to the CADRE site recently sent a question about Paul's statement in Acts 20:35 which records Paul as saying, "And remember the words of the Lord Jesus, that He said, 'It is better to give than to receive'." The reader wanted to know where Jesus said this. This was my answer: You are correct in noting that this saying of Jesus quoted by Paul is not found anywhere in the four Gospels. My own study Bible says "This is a rare instance of a saying of Jesus not found in the canonical Gospels." Does the fact that it isn't stated in the Gospels mean that it isn't reliably from the lips of Jesus? I don't think so. The Apolstle John said at the end of his Gospel (John 21:25): "Jesus did many other things as well.If every one of them were written down, I suppose that even the whole world would not have room for the books that would be written." Obviously, this is exaggeration for the sake of making a point, but it means that Jesus ...
Read more

Discussing Embryonic Stem Cell Research

By -
Stand to Reason has published a list of "talking points" that can be used as a quick reference sheet for answering questions about embryonic stem cell research and why people ought to oppose this procedure. The piece, entitled "Are you against stem cell research and cloning?" give good, concise answers to some of the questions that arise concerning why Christians would oppose this procedure when it supposedly holds such great promise. For example, consider the following from the "talking points": Where do we get human embryonic stem cells? We can only derive human embryonic stem cells by killing a human embryo. Removing its stem cells leaves it with no cells from which to build the organs of its body. What is the embryo? An embryo is a living, whole, human organism (a human being) in the embryonic stage. All the embryo needs to live is a proper environment and adequate nutrition, the very same thing all infants, toddlers, adolescents, and adults need. ...
Read more

Tillich, part 2: What does it mean to say "God is Being Itself?"

By -
 In this essay, which is a chapter from the new book I'm now working on, I'm moving toward defining what I think Tillich means exactly by being itself. It's a long journey but an important one. What does Tillich actually mean by “being itself?” Does he mean the same things as other theologians who use the phrase? It’s a mysterious sounding phrase and Tillich never actually comes out and says what he means by it. As I will show there is a reason for this, and I will show what I think that reason in is. In the mean time the task of this chapter is to deduce exactly what Tillich actually means by this phrase. There are three basic possibilities: Three alternatives as to meaning (1) The basic fact that things exist is all that the concept of “God” amounts to. (2) There is a special quality to being, an impersonal aspect” ground of being” or “being itself” and that quality constitutes ‘the divine.’ This possibility excludes God as “king of the universe.” (3) God is b...
Read more

Revamping and New Articles at the CADRE Site

By -
We have changed the Christian History page at the CADRE site from the old design to the new one. The focus of the revamped page has expanded, with many new articles: This page provides links to websites and articles relating to Christian history, including theological development, notable figures, contributions of Christianity to society and culture, and the archaeological evidence for the facts of the Bible. We have also added four new articles by Darin Wood, PhD: John Chrysostum: His Life, Legacy, and Influence Dr. Wood provides an informative sketch of Chrysostum's life, as well as an exploration into his writings and impact on church evangelism. The Righteousness of God in the Pauline Corpus Dr. Wood examines the crucial role that righteousness plays in understanding Paul's perspectives on justification, propitiation, expiation, and covenant. The Structure of the Apocalypse Dr. Wood provides an in-depth analysis of the structure (or structures) behind the Book o...
Read more

The Folded Napkin Legend

By J. P Holding -
I wrote about t his "urban legend" a few years ago, but it's typical of the silly urban legends we hear about now and then, such as the idea that the head of Proctor and Gamble went on Oprah to pledge his allegiance to Satanism. Christians are no less gullible for this sort of nonsense than anyone else, and frankly, some seem more gullible to believe anything that they consider "edifying". It's no wonder we're mesmerized by self-comfort tunes like "I Can Only Imagine" that contain about as much useful theology as a thimble. ** The Gospel of John (20:7) tells us that the napkin, which was placed over the face of Jesus, was not just thrown aside like the grave clothes. The Bible takes an entire verse to tell us that the napkin was neatly folded, and was placed at the head of that stony coffin.... In order to understand the significance of the folded napkin, you have to understand a little bit about Hebrew tradition of that day. The fol...
Read more

A Botched Abortion Shows the Lies of Pro-Choice Proponents

By -
One of the classes I teach at the university is a course on Ethics, and I am using a book by Ralph Dolgoff, Donna Harrington and Frank M. Lowenberg entitled " Ethical Decisions for Social Work Practice " as the text. Overall, I think that it is a good Ethics textbook largely because it provides a balanced viewpoint on the need for values in social work. For example, the book makes the argument (without committing to it) that those engaged in social work cannot avoid making value judgments in ethical decisions because trying to do what is right necessarily involves making an value choice. Also, I book notes that some (including me) think it is ethically wrong for a social worker to cover-up her own values when counseling another person because it creates a false (and ultimately unproductive) relationship with the person being counseled. Still, one of the exemplars in the book gave me pause – not because I thought it raised a deep ethical quandary, but because I wondered how ...
Read more

Do you say this of your own accord? (John 18:34, ESV)

By -
Image
One of the most well-known events in Scriptures is Jesus' exchange with Pontius Pilate at his trial as described in John 18. In verse 38 of that chapter, Pilate asks the question that may be the most ironic in the history of the world, "What is truth?" A less known but equally intriguing saying of Jesus from an apologetics viewpoint can be found in Jesus' response to an earlier question in the same trial. It is a question that is not often quoted, but on those rare occasions when it is quoted, Jesus' response is often overlooked as not particularly important or relevant to today's world. However, it is my experience (as well as the experience of many people who have truly spent time studying the Scriptures) that little, if any, of what Jesus said in the Bible lacks significance across time. To best understand the response, it's important to see the response in context. The situation is this: Jesus has been arrested following His betrayal by Judas I...
Read more

A Non-Biblical Historian Accepts the Key "Minimum Facts" Supporting Jesus' Resurrection

By -
In their book, The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus , Gary R. Habermas and Michael R. Licona argue for the historical reality of Jesus' bodily resurrection using the "minimum facts" approach. Rather than get bogged down in inerrancy and other debates, they focus on the key facts demonstrating Jesus' resurrection. For them, the key facts are: *Jesus' death by crucifixion. *Disciples' Beliefs that Jesus Appeared. *Conversion of Paul. *Conversion of James. *Empty Tomb. William L. Craig, another significant apologist for the historical bodily resurrection of Jesus likewise focuses, in his accessible The Son Rises , on the empty tomb and Jesus' resurrection appearance. Craig gives special emphasis to Jesus' honorable burial by Joseph of Arimathea and Jesus' appearances to James and Paul and their subsequent commitment to the Christian cause. Craig, Licona, and Habermas argue that these basic facts are generally supported by most of the relevant sc...
Read more