Another "Just Right" Element in our Solar System
I have another entry from Sky & Telescope magazine that adds further evidence that the Privileged Planet is More Privileged Than We Thought. In a news item entitled, "Our 'Goldilocks' Solar System," the magazine discusses a new scientific discovery regarding planet-building necessities.
Not too hot, not too cold. . . that's just part of what it takes to make a nice world like ours. Recent planet-building computations have found a new constraint. The protoplanetary disk of gas and dust that spawns a planetary system must be neither too massive nor too sparse.
If it's too massive, may giant planets will form. They interact and pull each other's orbits into chaos, expelling or wrecking any smaller worlds. Too little mass, and big planets wouldn't form at all. Our own solar system, which does have giant planets but in safe, distant, nearly round orbits, appears to be an unusual, right-on-the-balance case.
This in turn suggests that having giant planets in round orbits is somehow important for a terrestrial planet to develop intelligent life. If this were not so, we would be unlikely to find ourselves in a system of this unusual type.
Comments
Pathetic.
That claim is wrong. In order for life as we know it to exist at all, there very well may be a lot of such technical specifications that need to be met. As Hermit mentions above, that's another point where your argument fails.
So in the beginning there was God and a set of natural laws God had to bow down to.
No. It means there was a law of non-contradiction by which God is bound. The whole point of creating natural laws is that they be stable.