Is the Bible Irrelevant in Evangelism?

In the same article I was discussing yesterday (in a post entitled “Is it wrong to tell someone that they are sinful?”) where a Lutheran Pastor I know explains his belief that the reason that some people leave the church is that they have been given the wrong image of God, he continues with another sentence that I find very unusual for someone teaching in the church that bears the name of Martin Luther. He states:

“The God I know wants a relationship with me and not my dogma; wants me to love Jesus and not my confessions or my Bible because God knows my confessions and my Bible just can’t love me back and certainly didn’t love me first like God did.”

Of course we all agree that God wants a relationship with us, but apart from our dogma and our Bible, what do we know about this God? The answer is “very little.” Without the Bible and dogma, we have no God to worship that we can distinguish from the god of the Jehovah’s Witnesses, the god(s) of the Mormons or the god of Islam. In fact, all we have is the god of the philosophers—an eternally transcendent creator who spends eternity in self-contemplation. The way we know that we are worshipping the right God is through His revelation to us, which is found in the Bible and illuminated in the dogma and creeds.

To all appearances, this Pastor is again taking a very low view of the Bible. People with this view do not believe that the Bible means what it says on several issues. While I don’t know for certain, it seems probable that this Pastor is among those who question the authority of the Scripture to teach on various issues that confront the church, preferring instead to look for the easy road of compromising with culture rather than standing for the Word of God as delivered once for all to the Saints. (Jude 3). It is the view that God’s grace is so enveloping that the law portion of the Gospels is no longer relevant. I cannot agree with this viewpoint

It is not good theology to make the revealed Word of God part of the background noise which falls second to our relationship with God when, in fact, the Bible and our dogma (rightly understood) are necessary for us to grow in that relationship.

It does not seem to me that Martin Luther shared the view that this Pastor seems to express in his article. Consider the following quotes both of which are from Luther:

“I am afraid that the schools will prove the very gates of hell, unless they diligently labour in explaining the Holy Scriptures, and engraving them on the hearts of youth. I would advise no one to send his child where the Holy Scriptures are not supreme. Every institution in which men and women are not unceasingly occupied with the Word of God must be corrupt.”

“Let him who wants a true church cling to the Word by which everything is upheld.”

How does this Pastor’s view that the Bible is secondary to our relationship with God square with Luther’s high view that the Bible is supreme and the thing by which everything is upheld? I do not think it can be reconciled in any viable way.

More importantly for purposes of this blog, what effect would it have on apologetics if we were to tell our unchurched neighbor that their view of the Bible is irrelevant, and that God simply wants us to have a relationship with Him regardless of our understanding of who He is according to the Bible? Is this a good apologetic? I don’t think so. With this apologetic, we cannot be critical of our friends in the Jehovah’s Witnesses or the Mormons who also have a god —- just not the same God taught in the Bible. What do you think?

P.S. Sorry about the multiple posts yesterday. I have no idea what happened other than spontaneous generation which we all know is impossible, right?


biblemike said…
Tried to post on the first half of this posting, but could not. Search engine could not find the comment page.

IN any case, as I was about to say before, this pastor is falling into the trap of those who don't want to put the Bible first, rightly so, by rejecting it completely, wrongly so. I already know how it was going to turn out when he said the bit about telling people they are full of sin is wrong. Telling people they are full of sin and without any hope of redemption is certainly wrong. Telling them they do not need to address the sin in themselves, is not just wrong it is apostasy.

The Bible is God's revelation of Himself. We cannot understand Who He is without the scriptures. We cannot undestand what He wants without the revelation He inspired. To say we will just have a relationship with God is ridiculous. What God? How will I recognize Him? How will I know if it is just someone saying they are Him? After all, isn't Satan an angel of light and the most beautiful of all angels. What if he tries to fool me? How will I know?

God is the most important thing. It isn't about you or me. It is about Him. But the only way we can know enough to recognize Him or the only way we can know how best to please this great Being Who loves us so much, is to know what the Bible says about HIm, about what He wants and about how we can give Him that. The place we find that is in the Bible.

Imagine those two spacemen in the space station spending six months to a year in outer space without any manuals on how to operate and repair the place where they live. What do they do when the air filters break down? Where are the air filters anyway? Do you shut them down to repair them? How do you fight an electrical fire in outer space? Where is that equipment kept? How does it work? Anyway you get the point.

Rejecting the Bible and rejecting the concept of sinfulness that needs to be rectified helps no one. In fact it is worse than not just helping. It is guiding others away from their only hope of salvation. Jesus said it would be better to have amillstone put around your neck and drown than harm any who could be His. Paul said that anyone who preaches a gospel other than the one he preached should be accursed. If this man is your friend, go to him quickly and try to help him find the path back to where he needs to be for his sake as well as others.


Popular posts from this blog

Where did Jesus say "It is better to give than receive?"

How Many Children in Bethlehem Did Herod Kill?

Martin Luther King, Jr., Jesus, Jonah and U2’s Pride in the Name of Love

Dr. John Lennox: Video - Christmas for Doubters

On the Significance of Simon of Cyrene, Father of Alexander and Rufus

William Lane Craig on "If Mind is Reducible to Brain Function, Why Trust Thought?"

The Meaning of the Manger

Responding to the “Crimes of Christianity”; The Inquisition

Fine Tuning Bait and Switch