A Great Dawkins Parody

DaveScot at Uncommon Descent has linked to a great parody of Richard Dawkins' book The God Delusion that has been put on YouTube entitled The Dawkins Delusion. As commentor J. Parker notes:

Yet not as risible as Dawkins writing itself! Really, if you read his work without emotion, it’s (unintentionally) funny!

In fact, this is so funny because it’s his argument verbatim, just substituting “Dawkins” for God.

I found it very funny, myself. Take the five minutes it takes to watch it -- it will be worth your time.

(HT: CADRE member Jeff G)

Comments

Steven Carr said…
At the Richard Dawkins forum, a lot of the Dawkins supporters think it is a really funny parody.

Don't see it myself, but I suppose it is all a matter of taste.
Jason said…
Well, I'm convinced! I'm now an adawkinsist.
Steven Carr said…
Mind you, the video does have some pictures of Dawkins.

How did the producers get pictures of a non-existent being?
BK said…
What makes you think that's Dawkins? And besides, haven't you heard of Photoshop?
Steven Carr said…
As always, Christian parodies reveal that they cannot refute the arguments of their opponents and have to misrepresent them.
Steven Carr said…
Where are the devoted converts to Dawkins-worship who pour scorn on the idea that Dawkins writes books?

I can point to early devoted converts to Jesus-worship who poured scorn on the idea that God would choose to raise a corpse from the grave.
Layman said…
Wow. Four separate comments by Carr. This is really bugging you isn't it?

Now I will definetly check it out.

Popular posts from this blog

How Many Children in Bethlehem Did Herod Kill?

Martin Luther King, Jr., Jesus, Jonah and U2’s Pride in the Name of Love

How Should I Be A Sceptic -- belief and reason

Kierkegaard's Knights of Faith and the Account of Abraham

Bayes Theorem And Probability of God: No Dice!

Where did Jesus say "It is better to give than receive?"

The Meaning of the Manger

If Christianity were true, would you become a Christian?

The Origin of Life and the Fallacy of Composition