New Old Torah Scroll

"ASHKAR-GILSON 2 is a Torah scroll sheet possibly dated before 800 C.E. Unlike the new Library of Congress manuscript, this fragment is not fully legible without the help of modern technologies.

[...]

Nevertheless, the oldest complete Torah manuscripts are in the codex form; the most authoritative being the famous Aleppo Codex, dating to about 920 C.E., and the St. Petersburg Codex (formerly, Leningrad Codex), which dates to 1009 C.E.

The few surviving Torah scrolls that are this old are all very fragmentary and almost illegible. It is thus exciting to find a very old, well-preserved Torah scroll, even if it’s only a fragment, a single sheet. One such treasure has recently augmented the collection of the Library of Congress in Washington, D.C. As Gary Rendsburg, Chair of Jewish History at Rutgers University, explains in the November/December 2019 issue of Biblical Archaeology Review, this Torah manuscript is the oldest complete Torah scroll sheet fully legible to the naked eye.

Once part of a Torah scroll from circa 1000 C.E., this single sheet of parchment contains part of the Book of Exodus beginning with the Ten Plagues and ending with the first feeding of the Israelites with the “bread from heaven” in the wilderness (Exodus 10:10–16:15). “To our good fortune, and most unusually,” adds Rendsburg, “on the back of the sheet there is a bilingual inscription in Hebrew and Russian.” The inscription tells the fate of the manuscript during the 19th century, when it evidently was brought from the Middle East to Crimea. Eventually, it was presented to a brother of Russian Czar Alexander II."

Marek Dospel, New Old Torah Scroll

Comments

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Jesse Albrecht said…
You have got to be pretty dense in order to post that sort of a comment on this blog.
now that makes me curious to know what he said.
Jesse Albrecht said…
The commentor was just trying to advertise some service that he provides alongside with his email address. In short, what I deleted was spam.
Jesse Albrecht said…
If I may ask, what did you initially think was taking place in this comment thread?
Just curious no big deal, I wonder if it was the same guy runing down my journal.

Popular posts from this blog

How Many Children in Bethlehem Did Herod Kill?

The Bogus Gandhi Quote

Where did Jesus say "It is better to give than receive?"

Discussing Embryonic Stem Cell Research

Tillich, part 2: What does it mean to say "God is Being Itself?"

Revamping and New Articles at the CADRE Site

The Folded Napkin Legend

A Botched Abortion Shows the Lies of Pro-Choice Proponents

Do you say this of your own accord? (John 18:34, ESV)

A Non-Biblical Historian Accepts the Key "Minimum Facts" Supporting Jesus' Resurrection