we are about to lose the internet
Trump' FCC Plans Destruction of Net Neutrality
This is a disaster, It would be bad enough if raising fees to use the net meant I can't read comic books or looking at little You Tube things,No more music,That's my major connection to the music I love. But the move means much more than curtailment of pleasure surfing,It's the blow to apologetic.,Its closing of the only sources of information for countering new atheism lies and it's the only way to fight by spreading the word. Also for me it means no more books. No more blog no more theological research,
We only have until early December to act!
ALYSSA NEWCOMB "THE END IS NEAR FOR OBAMA ERA NEW NEUTRALITY RUELES," NBC NEWS
(NOV 21 2017, 4:51 PM ET)https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/end-near-obama-era-net-neutrality-rules-n822901
Everything from the way you use banking apps to the speed of your Netflix stream could soon be changing, if all goes to plan for the Federal Communications Commission.
The FCC's mission — essentially gutting the internet as we know it — would allow service providers to create so-called fast and slow lanes for subscribers.
Commission Chairman Ajit Pai, a Republican, announced on Tuesday a plan to put an end to what he called the federal government's "micromanaging" of the internet. Details of the proposal will be released on Wednesday, three weeks before it will be put to a vote by the FCC on Dec. [read More]
SIGN PETITION tell congress
https://savethenetfromtrump.com/
CALL YOUR MEMBER OF CONGRESS 202-224-3121
Republican Senators* at (844) 241-1141
Share this on social media put it on your blog,send links, Tell everyone, this is a disaster, This will kil all resistance to Trump, this is nothing less than control of the media,
sources
[1]
[2] ALYSSA NEWCOMB "THE END IS NEAR FOR OBAMA ERA NEW NEUTRALITY RUELES," NBC NEWS
(NOV 21 2017, 4:51 PM ET)
Comments
Of course I can see there are political issues involved but I thought we really do have common cause here unless you've given up on trying to reach people for Jesus,
tell me how you will manage on a web too expensive to use?
"When FCC Chairman Ajit Pai announced plans to repeal the Obama administration's heavy-handed "net neutrality" regulations, critics acted as if the world were coming to an end. Actual consumers, however, aren't likely to notice any difference, because the "problem" those rules were supposed to solve has always been wildly exaggerated."
Now, if you disagree, we can debate this. But the argument is based on politics. That's the problem.
"The Federal Communication Commission votes this Thursday on Restoring Internet Freedom, a proposal designed to return broadband internet access to the permission-less innovation framework that governed it until 2015. Leading left media outlets such as The New York Times have decried it as "gutting network neutrality," a "sweeping repeal of rules" and "removing all oversight from the sale of internet access." These points are patently untrue. What are the facts and why is the media peddling fake news?"
From: Make the Internet Free Again: The FCC plans to increase internet transparency and enforcement. So why is the left against it?
NYT is the best paper the country it's the only real new being printed. It's won the most awards of any paper.
Second, the very fact that you have somehow leapt to "trickle down dogma" again shows you that this is a political football. I repeat, since you seem okay to post this (and not take it down when challenged), I will return to posting stuff about abortion when something comes up that is worthwhile and I have the time.