CADRE Comments

A Rational Look at Christianity; Basing Reason in Truth

So HúmanLíght has cóme and góne (or stíll perháps is hére),
to célebráte "compássion, hópe, and reáson" fór the yeár.

The chíldish mÿth and sélf-decéptive fíction hás been húrled,
repláced by gládsome trúth of háppy fúture fór our wórld:

a fúture buílt by peóple whó exíst as fleéting líghts,
snuffed oút at lást and fínallÿ by dúmb amóral níght(s) --

peóple whó in trúth and fáct agaínst that chíldish mÿth
are útterlÿ and ónly máde of... whát the héck is thís?!

"Compássion, hópe and reáson?" Nó. They thréw that "mÿth" awáy.
And yét still wánt to célebráte those thíngs on Chrístmas Dáy,

forgétting theír own teáchings thát they wánt to teách at schoól:
they woúld have dóne much bétter tó keep Ódin ín their Yúle!

A troúblemáking wánderér, whose ónly sácrifíce
reveáls a cóming tríumph óf brutálitÿ and íce

all reáson ánd compássion, hópe and jóy destróyed at lást
and nóthing úp abóve him knóws or cáres of jústice pást.

To strúggle éven hópelesslÿ agaínst that fínal rúle
might bé heróic épic! -- but hópe is fór a foól.

So táke your pleásures whíle you cán, for nóthing bétter cómes,
and buíld your wólfen stréngth by meáns of tríbalístic súms.

Survíval óf the fíttest ís the bío-lógic wár.


...And yét you keép on reáching oút for sómething míssing: MÓRE!

Sómething yoú have thrówn awáy as ónly chíldish dreám,
for sómething thát you clóse your éyes agaínst, insteád of screám,

imáginíng a háppy fúture thát can néver bé,
if whát you reálly thínk is trué is Náture's déstinÿ.

Áll your ówn beháviors áre at bóttom ónly ghósts;
not rátionál or móral, háunting crúmbling creéping coásts.

I únderstánd you wánting tó affírm your soúls yoursélves,
as rátionál and móral:
BUT THÁT WOÚLD MEÁN YOÚ'RE ÉLVES!

Creátures móre than náturál, exísting bÿ the gífts
of Reáson ánd Morálitÿ -- which yoú denÿ as mÿths!

Or ráther you dény such thíngs, excépt to táke their pláce,
as thoúgh you "náturallÿ" transcénd the láws of Náture's spáce.

Súch a cóntradíction cánnot bé called rátionál!
You woúld have dóne much bétter tó keep Reáson, ín His stáll,

as the "reáson" for this Seáson, and for évery seáson, toó:
poúring oút His lífe to feéd and sáve both mé and yoú.

A míghty kíngly Pówer fár beyónd the skiés abóve,
and a húmble cáring Shépherd gíving oút Himsélf ín lóve,

sháring ín our líves and deáths; knówing áll our míserÿ;
vólunteéring fór a thróne upón a cúrs'd and paínful treé:

páying fór this neútral fiéld of Náture thát He máde,
where His chíldren cán exíst to pláy or múrder wíth a bláde,

or súffer ínconvéniencés when caúght betweén the sheáth,
and swórd of Náture's pleásures ór the típs of Náture's teéth!

Such a Náture ís impórtant ín which creátures cán be grówn,
but it cánnot bé the fínal trúth and groúnd of ús alóne;

not if wé beliéve in lóve, compássion, jústice, hópe and reáson:
válues whích -- as húmanísts! -- we célebráte this seáson.

And yét -- béing bórn in rísk: whére's the jústice thére?!
Ónly íf we háve a Fáther Whó agreés to sháre

our paín, our fáte, and thén to sháre with ús His fáte as wéll:
to ríse one dáy beyónd our deáths and rend the gates of hell!

You wánt a fínal jústice ín a faír togéthernéss?
Withoút a Lóve as groúnd of Áll you ónly énd in léss!

Nót illúsions of peóple;
nót a compétitive schísm;
not éven a lóne Authóritÿ,
and nót an átheísm:

ónly óne philósophÿ, if trué, can réassúre
that reáson, lóve and jústice wíll in ús one dáy be púre.

In célebráting húman líght, becaúse you hópe you cán,
don't thrów awáy the Reáson Whó
enlíghtens évery mán.


REASON'S GREETINGS
FROM THE CHRISTIAN CADRE
2013 Christmas Eve

At Christmastime, people often begin to look into the facts and theology surrounding the birth of Jesus of Nazareth. The CADRE has several interesting blog posts about Christmas that are well worth reading. Some are oriented as apologetics tools while others are more reflective. Among them are:



Was Jesus Born in Nazareth or Bethlehem?
          Part I – Introduction







There are lots more, and the listing of these particular articles is not intended to exclude or disparage others that some of our members have worked hard to create and which are equally interesting or important. You can find these other blog posts by typing words like “Bethlehem”, “Christmas”, “Herod”, and “Nazareth” into the search box in the upper right corner. Hopefully, other members or readers will post other important blog posts in the comments section. 

Finally, thank you for your interest. We appreciate our readers very much and wish you all a very Merry Christmas. 

This morning, I received my favorite Yuletide publication – my email of the American Humanist News. It caught my attention because the title of the email was “The Secular Holiday Issue (Part  1).” In the email was the link to an article entitled “How To Celebrate Humanlight, A December Holiday For Humanists.” 

Humanlight? What in the world is Humanlight?

Well, according to the article, Humanlight is a new holiday (first celebrated in 2001) that may have been set for December 23 so that Humanists can have a holiday to celebrate around Christmas. Why do I say it "may have been set for December 23"? That's a long story. Here’s what the article says:

HumanLight is a secular holiday on December 23rd. It’s designed to celebrate and express the positive, secular, human values of reason, compassion, humanity and hope. HumanLight illuminates a positive, secular vision of a happy, just and peaceful future for our world, a future which people can build by working together, drawing on the best of our human capacities.

* * *
Yet it is crucial to understand that HumanLight is not intended to be negative or critical towards religious people or other holidays. It’s not about trying to reinterpret or secularize Christmas. Since it’s not an attempt to create a secular version of Christmas, it avoids all the pitfalls and conflicts that come from that path. It cannot be dragged into the so-called “war on Christmas” media hype.

(Ah, so while I appreciate that the humanists have developed a “positive, secular vision” around the holidays. I guess I would be even more appreciative if the humanists would tell their fellow atheists at American Atheists which has “launched a new digital holiday billboard in Manhattan’s Times Square ... asking the provocative question, ‘Who needs Christ during Christmas?’” which they answer with an insulting “Nobody.” But, I digress.)

As I alluded above, while the date seems definitive, it really isn’t. You see, this new Humanist holiday has been has been scheduled for near Christmas but not on Christmas so as to not interfere with “holiday traditions that are based on supernatural religious beliefs which we don’t accept.” Now, I should note that HumanLight has been faithfully scheduled for December 23rd … unless the Humanist wants to celebrate it on another date. According to the article,

The 23rd was chosen so that it would not conflict with other existing holidays, but would still be in the thick of the holiday season, when many gatherings of friends and family occur and people might be off from work. We've always said that it can be celebrated "on or around" December 23, in order to avoid any rigid rules about dates.

So, if I read this right, this is a holiday that has no set date because, as freethinkers, there should not be any rules. But then, of course, the date isn’t that important, is it? What should be more important is how the holiday is to be celebrated. You know, Christmas is the celebration of the Birth of Christ through going to church, exchanging presents (because He first gave to us), Christmas trees, etc. Hanukkah is the miracle of the candles that is celebrated through the lighting of the hanukkiah and playing dreidel. Perhaps, it should be how we celebrate the holiday that is important. The article notes:

What happens at a HumanLight celebration? Anything you want! The specific activities involved in any HumanLight celebration are open to invention and creativity, and will vary from place to place. There are no preset “rules” for how to celebrate. There is no prescribed ceremony or ritual. There is no “holy text” to read. There is no secret handshake.

Of course. Why should there be rules or expectations about the celebration for people who set their own rules when there isn't even a set date? But even so, there are, apparently, suggestions as to how to celebrate HumanLight:

In celebrating HumanLight, there should be some component that serves in some way to celebrate and express humanist-oriented values and ideals in a positive manner. How this is done, and to what degree, is up to the discretion and creativity of those involved in the celebration. But this concept relates to the basic purpose and meaning of the holiday.

So, even the suggestions of how to celebrate remain vague and left completely up to the individual. And, of course, given that the holiday is brand new, it wouldn’t be right to expect that any Humanist traditions have developed around this new holiday (although I cannot image freethinkers feeling bound to follow traditions).

In all sincerity, I have no problem with Humanists celebrating HumanLight. I would be happy to attend a HumanLight party to enjoy the company of my Humanist friends as long as it doesn’t interfere with the celebration of Christmas. In fact, if they are serious about making sure the celebration of HumanLight is positive and not “used for negative criticism towards religion”, I would welcome this approach greatly over the usual insulting approach that too many atheists take towards this very important day to believing Christians. But contrary to the claim in the article that HumanLight is "not an attempt to create a secular version of Christmas," I don’t believe that HumanLight is anything more than a Christmas alternative. It is held “on or around” December 23 so that it can be celebrated on Christmas Eve or Christmas Day when all of the Humanists’ friends, neighbors and relatives are over otherwise celebrating Christmas. The rules relating to the celebration remain vague in part so that Humanists can put up trees, exchange gifts, sing secular Christmas song (e.g., "Santa Claus is coming to town") and take the kids to see Santa Claus without feeling that they are compromising their Humanist beliefs. It allows the keeping of traditions of Christmas while abandoning the real reason for celebrating Christmas at all. That’s fine if that’s what the Humanists want to do. I certainly don't oppose them setting up as many Christmas alternatives as they please.

But as for me, I choose to celebrate Christmas: the night that God came into our real, broken world through the birth of the second person of the Trinity as a human being ultimately to die on a cross to pay for our crimes so that those who accept this great truth can receive the gift of becoming true sons of God. That’s much more meaningful to me.


Is God necessary for humans to love?

http://metacrock.blogspot.com/

Use of Content

The contents of this blog may be reproduced or forwarded via e-mail without change and in its entirety for non-commercial purposes without prior permission from the Christian CADRE provided that the copyright information is included. We would appreciate notification of the use of our content. Please e-mail us at christiancadre@yahoo.com.