Chinese
French
German
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Russian
Spanish
For the two of you who may be awaiting the third part of my
series responding to the question of why God would create an atheist knowing
that he would be sent to hell, I apologize. I had a series of other projects
that have come up that have taken priority. I will be posting the third part
(hopefully shortly), but in the meantime, a friend reminded me of an article
that I thought would be of interest to those of the Apologetics bent, like me.
He initially directed my attention to the video called the Star of Bethlehem that makes the case as to what the Star of Bethlehem may have been. He stated
that he had doubts about the video because it required that Jesus be born after
4 B.C., and he noted (correctly) that the present historical consensus is that
Herod the Great died in 4 B.C.
This reminded me that I had seen an article a while ago that
made a very strong case that Herod had to have died later than 4 B.C. In fact,
the article makes the case that Herod had to die in 1 B.C. which would clear up
many of the problems surrounding dating his death earlier.
The article entitled When Did Herod the Great Reign? by
Andrew E. Steinmann (which can be linked from here) shows the following as its abstract:
For about 100 years there has been
a consensus among scholars that Herod the Great reigned from 37 to 4 BCE.
However, there have been several challenges to this consensus over the past
four decades, the most notable being the objection raised by W.E. Filmer. This
paper argues that Herod most likely reigned from late 39 BCE to early 1 BCE,
and that this reconstruction of his reign can account for all of the surviving
historical references to the events of Herod's reign more logically than the
current consensus can. Moreover, the reconstruction of Herod's reign proposed
in this paper accounts for all of the datable evidence relating to Herod's
reign, whereas the current consensus is unable to explain some of the evidence
that it dismisses as ancient errors or that it simply ignores.
I think one of the most fascinating parts of the paper
relates to the dating of Herod’s death based upon the writings of Josephus who
relates that Herod died after a lunar eclipse but before the Passover. As the
author notes:
Unlike the dates for the beginning
of Herod’s reign, Josephus simply relates that Herod died after a lunar
eclipse, but before the Passover. Between 7 BCE and 1 BCE there were three
total and one partial lunar eclipses:
Table 1. Lunar Eclipses Between 7 BCE
and 1 BCE
[The table lists the following
four potential lunar eclipses:
March 23, 5 BCE – Total 29 days between
the date of the Eclipse and Passover
September 15, 5 BCE, Total 7
months between the date of the Eclipse and Passover
March 13, 4 BCE, Partial 29 days between
the date of the Eclipse and Passover
January 10, 1 BCE, Total 92 days between
the date of the Eclipse and Passover]
Since the eclipse in March of 5 BCE
would require Herod’s death to have taken place in April of 5 BCE, too early
even for the Schürer consensus, that eclipse is not a possible candidate. While
the eclipse of September of the same year is possible and has its defenders, it
is highly unlikely. It would mean that Herod died in late 5 BCE. Since Josephus
reports that Herod was nearly seventy years old shortly before his death, and
that he was twenty-five years old when his father Antipater named him governor
of Galilee in 47 BCE, it follows that Herod was born about 72 BCE. He would have been only 66 or 67 in 5 BCE. Moreover,
Josephus gives a detailed discussion of the events between the eclipse and the
Passover during the year of Herod’s death (see discussion below), and seven
months appears to be an excessive amount of time for these to have taken place,
even if one discounts some of Josephus’ discussion of these events as tainted
by Josephus’ rhetorical and ideological
tendencies.
The paper continues by examining each of the possible dates,
and concludes that the only possible eclipse that could account for the facts
given by Josephus. Steinmann states: “All of the events related by Josephus
comfortably fit into the ninety-two days between the eclipse and the following
Passover. Moreover, Herod would have been about 70 years old in early 1 BCE.”
Steinmann also examines the New Testament and the
information available about the reigns of Herod’s heirs to develop additional
evidence for the 1 BCE date for Herod’s death. He concludes the paper with the
following:
The consensus about the reign of
Herod that is built around Schürer’s interpretation of Josephus is fraught with
difficulties. It fails to fit any of the verifiable chronological data external to
Josephus and must resort to unlikely readings of Josephus’ chronological data
and dismissal of other data as mistaken. A reexamination of the data
demonstrates that Herod actually reigned from 39 BCE to his death in early 1 BCE.
A very worthwhile read.