tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6363362.post117198586817031563..comments2024-03-14T08:15:15.207-07:00Comments on CADRE Comments: Dealing with the Inductive Argument Against the ResurrectionBKhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01967809861892681780noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6363362.post-1172005510777985432007-02-20T13:05:00.000-08:002007-02-20T13:05:00.000-08:00Excellent observations, Vinnie.Excellent observations, Vinnie.BKhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01967809861892681780noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6363362.post-1171997006725052862007-02-20T10:43:00.000-08:002007-02-20T10:43:00.000-08:00On a more fundamental level, no argument from indu...On a more fundamental level, no argument from induction can ultimately prove anything. There is no logical necessity involved in the idea of a man and dying. This is where you use David Hume, ironically, to flout skepticism.<BR/><BR/>If you choose to define man as mortal then all men do die. But if man is provisionally described as mortal on the basis of observation there is always room for Vinceny Saponehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11808283456054329009noreply@blogger.com