tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6363362.post115370546995954008..comments2024-03-14T08:15:15.207-07:00Comments on CADRE Comments: An Excellent Review of Doherty's BookBKhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01967809861892681780noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6363362.post-1153925899427031832006-07-26T07:58:00.000-07:002006-07-26T07:58:00.000-07:00Steven Carr said... "On a related subject , in 2 C...Steven Carr said... <BR/>"On a related subject , in 2 Corinthians 11:4, Paul rails against people who are winning converts by preaching a 'different Jesus' to his Jesus (Paul preached Christ crucified). Does Paul ever describe these different Jesus's that some Christians were worshipping?"<BR/><BR/>Yes I think it's pretty clear the "different Jesus" is the one he is discussing that his oppents Joseph Hinman (Metacrock)https://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6363362.post-1153849456439026882006-07-25T10:44:00.000-07:002006-07-25T10:44:00.000-07:00One thing I'll say for ED, he turned a website int...One thing I'll say for ED, he turned a website into a book; I am impressed with that. <BR/><BR/>Kevin's review is very strong. It is entirely appropriate to look at the larger historical context as he does.<BR/><BR/>From my own perspective, I've found Doherty's theory (from the website, granted, not the book) very creative (though he borrows from others also) but still unconvincing. The NT Tenaxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05825416797769424875noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6363362.post-1153834150638083852006-07-25T06:29:00.000-07:002006-07-25T06:29:00.000-07:00In 2 Cor 11 (and afterward, through the end of the...In 2 Cor 11 (and afterward, through the end of the topic so far as I can tell), Paul isn't contrasting his message to those who preach something other than Christ being crucified (the phrase doesn't seem to appear in that section, nor in the introduction which precedes it.) Based on the details he _does_ give (in vv12-15, 22-23), all we can say is that they were claiming to be apostles of Christ,Jason Pratthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01602238179676591394noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6363362.post-1153807229781882762006-07-24T23:00:00.000-07:002006-07-24T23:00:00.000-07:00On a related subject , in 2 Corinthians 11:4, Paul...On a related subject , in 2 Corinthians 11:4, Paul rails against people who are winning converts by preaching a 'different Jesus' to his Jesus (Paul preached Christ crucified). Does Paul ever describe these different Jesus's that some Christians were worshipping?Steven Carrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11983601793874190779noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6363362.post-1153747455890474562006-07-24T06:24:00.000-07:002006-07-24T06:24:00.000-07:00Maybe E.D. is thinking of radical docetists? They ...Maybe E.D. is thinking of radical docetists? They could be said to have believed that Jesus never existed on earth (literally, no footprints etc.) And based on Johannine evidence, the canonical author could have been pinging against people of that sort on occasion, in the second half of the 1st c. ('If someone denies that Jesus has come in the flesh', etc.)<BR/><BR/>I think the super-docetists Jason Pratthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01602238179676591394noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6363362.post-1153707463489711342006-07-23T19:17:00.000-07:002006-07-23T19:17:00.000-07:00Much appreciated words, Chris.Much appreciated words, Chris.Kevin Roserohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10561966426667018210noreply@blogger.com