tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6363362.post109990130249635400..comments2024-03-14T08:15:15.207-07:00Comments on CADRE Comments: BKhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01967809861892681780noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6363362.post-1100367242373015102004-11-13T09:34:00.000-08:002004-11-13T09:34:00.000-08:00Actually, Mr. Carr, the evidence is quite strong t...Actually, Mr. Carr, the evidence is quite strong that "Son of God" is original to the text. I will explain in a new post.Laymanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11761410435140602771noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6363362.post-1100208544717678302004-11-11T13:29:00.000-08:002004-11-11T13:29:00.000-08:00Important early witnesses, including Origen, and C...Important early witnesses, including Origen, and Codex Sinaiticus, the only Great Codex to contain the entire New Testament, omit the phrase, Son of God. <br /><br />As Origen was exceptionally interested in textual matters, it is hard to believe he would make such a blunder as to omit such a phrase, from such a position in the Gospel.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com